![]() That makes it harder for coastal regions to get accurate storm predictions. Moreover, land-based radar doesn't cover specific mountainous regions in the U.S., nor does it extend over the ocean. In fact, most of Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, India, and many other places lack radar coverage. Local ground radar, which is what Americans usually see on the local news, is not available in all locations. The NASA radar satellite has a lag time of three days or more for its information, simply due to distance and how often it passes over the U.S. "We're going to create a significant revolution when it comes to weather forecasting and climate modeling and be able to help the National Hurricane Center hopefully have better hurricane forecasting and help insurance companies insure farmers in India and Brazil, and help airlines fly from JFK to London in a much safer route and by wasting less fuel," said Elkabetz. The new radar satellite, however, will offer a much broader scope of data. The information it used came from government radar, data satellites, weather stations, cellular signal attenuation, and even connected vehicles with wiper and temperature sensors - what its CEO and co-founder, Shimon Elkabetz, called the "weather of things." Tomorrow.io used proprietary software not just to predict but also to help companies plan for severe weather. Personal Loans for 670 Credit Score or Lower Personal Loans for 580 Credit Score or Lower ![]() The proposed Trans-Atlantic Data Privacy Framework may provide companies with a legal basis to continue such transfers when the European Commission’s approval is finalized, though concerns remain that the framework fails to provide EU citizens with adequate remedies for unlawful surveillance.Best Debt Consolidation Loans for Bad Credit The DPC’s order could have major consequences for other platforms and companies that transfer personal data between the EU and U.S. But Monday’s decision-the result of an investigation by the Irish DPC and a recent ruling by the European Data Protection Board-rejected Meta’s argument that these clauses adequately safeguard the fundamental rights of EU data subjects. The dispute ultimately led the European Court of Justice to invalidate both the U.S.-EU Safe Harbor Agreement (in Schrems I) and the U.S.-EU Privacy Shield Agreement (in Schrems II, a case in which EPIC participated as amicus).įollowing Schrems II, Meta continued to carry out cross-border data transfers on the basis of “standard contractual clauses,” which purport to provide EU user data with protections equivalent to the GDPR when transferred to other countries. ![]() In 2013, privacy advocate (and EPIC Advisory Board member) Max Schrems filed a complaint alleging that Facebook violated EU law when it transferred personal data to the U.S., where surveillance law fails to provide adequate privacy protections or remedies for non-U.S. The order arises from the long-running dispute over cross-border transfers of EU residents’ personal data to the U.S. and to bring its processing into compliance with the GDPR. The order also requires Meta to delete EU users’ personal data unlawfully transferred to the U.S. Ireland’s Data Protection Commission has fined Meta €1.2 billion and ordered the company to suspend transfers of personal data to the United States within five months, finding that Meta’s transfers violation the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |